How do you ensure conservation of a species that spends less than half of its life on protected breeding areas? The first step is to learn where they go. That is not so easy when working with an organism like the golden-cheeked warbler, a Neotropical migrant that weighs one-third of an ounce (a little less than 10 g). Recently, biologists attached tiny light-level recorders to golden-cheeked warblers from five protected breeding populations in Texas to discover the wintering grounds and migratory pathways of this endangered species. Dr. Jim Mueller, I&M Zone Biologist, and Scott Rowin, Balcones Canyonlands National Wildlife Refuge Biologist, are collaborating with biologists from Fort Hood (John Macey [project leader] and Nathan Grigsby), Camp Bullis (Shannon Carrasco), Texas A&M University (Dr. Ashley Long), and Tarleton State University (Dr. Roger Wittie). More information about the project is highlighted in the feature at Backpacks for Birds.
Dr. Paige Schmidt was recently invited by Louisiana State University’s School of Natural Resources to provide a seminar. Her presentation, “The role of science in the National Wildlife Refuge System: examples from Oklahoma and Texas” was well received. The examples she discussed included snowy plover monitoring at Salt Plains National Wildlife Refuge (NWR); evaluation of environmental DNA to determine the distribution and abundance of aquatic karst species at Ozark Plateau NWR and the Ozark Highlands Emphasis Area; standardized surveys of white-tailed deer at 3 refuges; the development of a duck-energy-model to determine how management decisions influence energetic carrying capacity for wintering waterfowl at Sequoyah NWR; and evaluation of forest and landbird monitoring data at Little River NWR. In addition to her presentation, Paige met with undergraduate and graduate students to discuss internship and career opportunities in the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Many faculty were particularly interested to know what skills she felt were most important for recent undergraduates so they could ensure students leaving their program would be well-trained for today’s natural resources issues.
Previously, Paige attended the 23rd Annual Wildlife Society Conference, in Raleigh, North Carolina. Paige is an active member, former Chair, and current Secretary/Treasurer of TWS’ Native Peoples’ Wildlife Management Working Group which is composed of wildlife professionals and students, tribal and non-tribal, who recognize native people’s cultural, spiritual, and ecological connections to the land. TWS and the Working Group have been exploring ways to promote the development of indigenous wildlife students; both believe one of the most-effective ways to support indigenous wildlife students is to give them an opportunity to attend and participate in TWS’s Annual Conference – the largest gathering of wildlife professionals in North America. TWS, with support from multiple federal agencies, implemented a competitive Native Student Professional Development Program. Individuals selected for this program receive grants to cover costs of conference attendance along with a one-year membership in TWS and the Native People’s Wildlife Management Working Group, subscription to The Wildlife Professional and The Wildlifer, discounts on TWS peer-reviewed publications, and access to the TWS website, blog, career center, mentoring program, and other online resources. During the conference, participants are mentored through the working group. Paige has served as a mentor to program participants for several years and considers this to be one of the most important aspects of her attendance at the annual conference.
The Texas Chapter of the Wildlife Society met in February 2016 and recognized Dr. Matthew Butler as lead author for the “Best Technical Publication“. Specifically, the publication is the I&M protocol for surveying whooping cranes at and around Aransas National Wildlife Refuge in Texas (get protocol). Co-authors include: Cinthia Eichhorn, the talented Data Manager and GIS expert for USFWS southwest, and Brad Strobel, now the head biologist at Necedah National Wildlife Refuge in Wisconsin.
Dr. Jena Moon, Texas Gulf Coast Zone Biologist, was voted in as the Vice President of the Texas Chapter of the Wildlife Society! Jena is an excellent selection for the Board, given her hard work, dedication to wildlife management, and effective collaboration with the public, private landowners, state and federal agencies, and non-profit organizations. In her role, Jena is anticipated to promote a positive public image for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Texas Chapter of the Wildlife Society, and the wildlife profession.
Congratulations to Matt, Cinthia, Brad and Jena!
During the month of August 2014, Region 2 Division of Biological Science’s Jeremy Edwardson (Wildlife Biologist, Okmulgee, OK), partook in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s high priority waterfowl banding program in Canada. The waterfowl banding program is a large-scale effort that is essential in monitoring migrating waterfowl and provides crucial information on migratory bird hunting and harvest assessments. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service representatives and other organizations from across North America gather to assist with the banding program every year and is part of a cooperative agreement among Canada, United States, and Mexico.
Big Grass Crew preparing for a banding session
Jeremy participated on the banding crew based at Big Grass Marsh near Plumas, Manitoba. This 12,400 acre marsh is owned and managed by Ducks Unlimited, and was the first large scale Ducks Unlimited restoration project in Canada. The crew also consisted of Chad Carlson (Biological technician, Sand Lake NWR), Seth Fisher (Wildlife Biologist, Tensas River NWR), and crew leader, Rob Spangler (USFWS Pilot – Wildlife Biologist, Lakewood, CO). In addition, the crew was supported by Canadian Wildlife Service employee, Darin Walker. During the 2014 Big Grass Marsh banding season, a total of 287 trap nights (August 6-26) resulted in 4,109 ducks banded (870 Mallards, 2,893 Blue-winged Teal, 180 Redheads, 90 Canvasbacks, 50 Wood Ducks, 10 Northern Pintail; 4 American Green-winged Teal, 4 Ruddy Ducks, 3 American Black Ducks, 3 Mallard – American Black Duck hybrids, 1 Northern Shoveler, and 1 Lesser Scaup).
A full trap of ducks near Big Grass Marsh, Manitoba
This detail provided program participants hands on training and strengthened teamwork characteristics. Specifically, Jeremy was able to develop a larger network of contacts, improved waterfowl identification and capture techniques, strengthened live bird handling experience, and provided opportunities at obtaining airboat operating hours towards his airboat operator certification. All of which will support his role of supporting Oklahoma refuges and the Division of Biological Sciences.
Jeremy Edwardson with a banded American Black Duck
Despite varying challenges, crews scattered throughout Canada were able to work together and resulted in a successful banding effort for 2014. The crews’ efforts played a significant role in assisting one of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services’ main mission of managing waterfowl.
Crews overcame high water challenges and focused efforts on more productive locations
Visit www.flyways.us for more information on the banding program and other projects that are vital to waterfowl management
In 2012, the USFWS entered into a binational partnership with the Civil Society for the Conservancy and Development of Natural Areas (CDEN), Friends of Laguna Atascosa National Wildlife Refuge, Gladys Porter Zoo, and (in 2013) the San Antonio Zoo. This partnership was formed to locate a large population of ocelots in northern Tamaulipas, Mexico, to assess if it might be able to serve as a potential source for translocation to smaller, at-risk populations such as the ones located in south Texas.
A collage of a few representative photographs of the wild felines photographed as part of the study in coastal Tamaulipas, Mexico.
Ocelots are endangered in the Texas mostly due to a loss of their habitat, most of which occurred from the 1930’s to the 1960’s. Collisions with vehicles also pose a threat. While both of these issues are being countered with efforts in Texas, the looming threat of a significant loss of their genetic diversity, that occurred over a long period of time, needs to be addressed. Studies suggested that the most appropriate source for re-establishing the historic genetic diversity of ocelots in Texas would be from the state of Tamaulipas, Mexico, and translocation of wild ocelots has been suggested as an option to achieve this goal.
As with any reintroduction project, there are several items that must be considered carefully. Among those considerations are the appropriateness of the genetics of the individuals to be introduced, an assessment of disease presence and risk from both recipient and source populations, and arguably most importantly, maintaining the integrity of the source population.
A relatively dense population of ocelots was discovered about 3 hours south of the Texas/Mexico border, in the low sierras along the coast of Tamauliaps. The great diversity of species in the area is a sign of the quality of the habitat – including jaguar, puma, jaguarundi, bobcat, white-tailed deer, javelinas, and turkey among others.
An adult female ocelot and her kitten photographed as part of the study in Tamaulipas.
CDEN, our partners in Tamaulipas, used game cameras to capture photographs of ocelots and identified individuals based on fur patterns. They counted 20 ocelots in a relatively small area, equating to a density of 1 ocelot/4.92km2. An estimate of the surrounding ocelot habitat and an extrapolation of the ocelot density provided a very conservative estimate of 117 ocelots in the metapopulation of the surrounding area.
A series of simulations of scenarios with and without translocation of ocelots from this source population were conducted as part of a Population Viability Analysis and the results were only a very low occurrence of negative effects to the source population. over 500 years.
The partnership has provided the data and a report to the government of Mexico on May 27, 2014, as requested in 2013, so that that they can assess the design, analysis and conclusions, and we will wait for their review. The partnership remains committed to maintaining an effective monitoring effort for this important ocelot population as well as the other species in this rich wildlife community.
Little River NWR completed their Inventory and Monitoring Plan (IMP) with a team including Refuge Manager David Weaver, Refuge Forester John Stephens, Zone Biologist Paige Schmidt, Regional I&M Coordinator Kris Metzger, Lead Biologist for National I&M Program Peter Dratch, Zone Biologist for Central and Eastern Texas Jim Mueller, Zone Biologist for Great Plains Bill Johnson, and Wildlife Refuge Specialist at Caddo Lake NWR Jason Roesner. This effort served as the pilot IMP for Region 2 and was the first IMP approved in the region. Further, Mark Chase presented this IMP to Rowan Gould when he briefed him on the National I&M policy. Service staff can log into ServCat at https://ecos.fws.gov/ServCat/ to download a copy of the Plan or to search other approved IMPs.
The photo shows (from left to right) David Weaver, Bill Johnson, Paige Schmidt, Kris Metzger and Peter Dratch checking out a freshwater mussel bed after completion of the IMP pilot workshop.
As a child my mother told me I would never have a career that kept me playing in the mud…..well she was only partially right. The mud of Texas coastal marshes hold the secrets of times gone past. We are currently starting a study of sediment depositions and elevation levels to understand past and current perturbations from widespread weather events such as hurricanes and long-term trends of climate change.
The Gulf Coast has suffered extensive loss of coastal marshes since human settlement. Where marsh loss has not been directly caused by rising sea level and other anthropogenic activities, it has been caused by a shift from emergent wetland vegetation to mudflats and open water due to salt water intrusion. Sea level rise, subsidence, and anthropogenic hydrological alterations have changed the environmental parameters that historically regulate coastal marsh function, resulting in their degradation. Global climate change additionally poses significant long-term threats to coastal marsh habitats and species that are dependent on those habitats along the Texas coast.
So how do we measure changes in marsh elevations? We measure elevation changes in coastal marsh with a Surface Elevation Table (SET for short).
SETs use a stable platform and a rotating horizontal arm to detect changes in elevation of the marsh surface. The arm is a portable mechanical leveling device for measuring relative sediment elevation changes. The arm has a series of pins that are dropped to the soil surface and then provide researchers with accurate and precise measurements (mm resolution) that are always taken in the exact location.
Over time these measurements can be mapped and then can provide trends of surface change over time.
This work is important because most climate change models are predicting appreciable sea-level rise along the Texas Gulf Coast. NOAA National Water Level Observation Network tide stations indicate that sea-level rise is not occurring at congruent levels along the entirety of the Texas Coast. Sea-level rise estimates from the Port Isabel tide station indicate a sea-level rise of 1.97 mm, well under the global average of 3.1 mm per year. However, tide stations near Galveston, Texas estimate sea-level rise to be occurring at 6.84 mm per year, over twice the global average. Because the rate of sea level rise for the upper Texas Coast is greater than the global average, it likely reflects the additional impact of local land subsidence due to oil and gas activities or ground water extraction. This information will allow the I&M program to improve climate modeling efforts on National Wildlife Refuges to improve species specific management such as those for whooping cranes and mottled ducks. Additionally, it will allow biologists and managers to better plan and carry out future conservation efforts.
In addition to SETs, coastal I&M staff have assisted in the collection of soil cores for vertical profiling of Cesium-137. Cesium occurs in distinct layers due to fall-out from nuclear testing in the 1940s-early 1960’s. In 1963 the Test Ban Treaty outlawed nuclear testing, which now is allowing geologists to use this unique signature within the soil profile to map long-term soil changes, aggradation and subsidence rates in coastal marshes.
We have collected several samples from Chenier National Wildlife Refuges Complex, Texas Mid-Coast Refuges Complex, and Aransas National Wildlife Refuge for analysis. This project aims to further our understanding of the impacts of sea-level rise, altered hydrology, and subsidence on coastal marshes by establishing a series of SET benchmarks and vegetation monitoring sites on coastal National Wildlife Refuges. The collected data will be compared to local rates of sea-level rise as observed through the National Water Level Observation Network tide stations. he data collected for this project should be able to measure minimum detectable changes in aggradation and subsidence that are significantly less than this observed rate of sea-level rise, and will provide valuable site level information regarding the effects of these processes in a variety of marsh types as well as insight to potential impacts on their future condition. Information collected will be used to improve conservation planning and management actions (e.g., restorative efforts, prescribed burning, etc.) within the coastal zone and to improve climate models (e.g., Sea-level Affecting Marshes Model).